Wang CX, Yan P, Lan LJ, Zhao BN, Kang J, Li MQ, Liu DF. Diagnostic efficacy and influencing factors of non-invasive liver fibrosis scores in chronic hepatitis B fibrosis: Cross-sectional study. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(5): 116008 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i5.116008]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
I am very satisfied with the entire peer review and publishing process of this journal. The online submission system is user-friendly, the peer review process is efficient and rigorous, and the reviewers’ comments are professional, constructive, and greatly helped to improve the quality of my manuscript. The editing and production team also did an excellent job in standardizing the manuscript format, typesetting the figures and tables, and proofreading the final version. The published article meets my expectations perfectly. I would definitely consider submitting my future research to this journal again.